For More Information:
July 22, 2014
Press Release / For Immediate Release
Vote NO 67 Kicks Off 2014 Campaign
Broad-Based Coalition Vows to Fight Efforts To Ban Abortions and
Restrict Contraception in Colorado
The coalition opposing Amendment 67 kicked off its statewide campaign today, vowing to once again defeat efforts to ban all abortions in Colorado, including in cases of rape and incest and when the health of a woman is at risk.
With the Colorado Capitol serving as the backdrop, speakers warned of the dangerous, far-reaching consequences of Amendment 67.
“Amendment 67 truly is an attack on family planning, an attack on a woman’s access to health care, an attack on the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship, and an attack on basic rights of women in Colorado,” said Vicki Cowart, CEO & President of Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains.
“Amendment 67 would remove a woman's ability to make her own reproductive health care decisions.”
The Vote NO 67 coalition is broad-based, bipartisan coalition of doctors, nurses and other health care advocates, groups working against domestic violence and on behalf of rape survivors, faith and civil rights leaders, and community organizations.
Dr. Ruben Alvero, a Colorado doctor of obstetrics and gynecology, warned of likely outcomes.
Amendment 67 would restrict access to emergency contraception and commonly used forms of birth control -- including the Pill and IUDs. It could impede the use of in-vitro fertilization for infertile couples who are hoping to have a family, Alevero said. And, stem cell research that is being used to fight chronic disease and disabilities could be restricted.
“Amendment 67 is bad medicine for women and for Colorado,” Alvero said. “It would allow the government and the courts to violate the sanctity of doctor/patient privacy, and allow government access to women’s private medical records.
“As an OB/GYN, I opposed this dangerous proposal when it was put before Colorado voters in 2008 and 2010. I oppose it again this year,” he said.
This is the third time proponents of Amendment 67 have attempted to ban all abortions in Colorado. Similar measures were overwhelmingly rejected by voters in 2008 and 2010. This year proponents are calling Amendment 67 the “Brady Amendment.”
If passed, Amendment 67 would expand the term “person” in the Colorado Constitution to include “unborn human being” – which has no established legal or medical definition, speakers noted. Further, the term “unborn human being” is not defined in the amendment – leaving the door wide open.
“We must protect women and their unborn children,” said Cristina Aguilar, executive director of the Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights (COLOR). “But Amendment 67 is written in language that tries to trick us. It would actually do the opposite – it would criminalize women and outlaw all abortion, including women who are the victims of rape, incest, and when a women’s life is at risk.”
Aguilar highlighted the far-reaching and negative consequences for Latinas and their families.
“This amendment would eliminate a Latina’s right to make personal, private decisions about her body and her health,” she said. “It would allow the government access to her private medical records.”
Nathan Woodliff-Stanley, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, described how Amendment 67 would invite the government into peoples’ personal, private lives.
“Quite simply, it means that the term “unborn human being” would apply to all stages of pregnancy – all the way back to a fertilized egg,” Woodliff-Stanley said. “Amendment 67 would make pregnant women and health care providers criminally liable for any pregnancy that does not result in a live birth, right from the very first moments of a pregnancy.”
“Women need the full range of health care options when it comes to family planning. Every woman is different and every situation is different,” noted Karen Middleton, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado. “Amendment 67 does the opposite of giving women informed choices. It’s dangerous and it limits their freedom to live their own lives.”
The Rev. Jann Halloran, president of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice Of Colorado, highlighted concerns from the faith community.
“Decisions about family planning, pregnancy, birth control and emergency contraceptives should be resolved privately, based upon our own faith, our beliefs and values,” Halloran said.
Fofi Mendez, campaign manager for Vote NO 67, said, “Denying women access to medical treatments, and even contraception, does not protect women, their children and families,” Mendez said. “Coloradans saw through this and overwhelmingly voted this down in 2008 and 2010."
“Once again we need to deliver the message in November: No means no.”
"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"
— Amendment 67 on the November ballot.
We all want to protect pregnant women, right?
For More Information:
Launch of Vote NO 67 Campaign
Action from Approx. 200 Attendees, Speakers Describing the Campaign,
Professional and Homemade signs
Join our broad-based coalition of doctors, nurses, health advocacy organizations, faith and civil rights leaders and community groups on the West Steps of the Colorado State Capitol at Noon on Tuesday, July 22 for our kickoff rally opposing Colorado’s Amendment 67, this year’s version of the “Personhood” Amendment.
What: Vote NO 67 Campaign Kickoff
When: Noon-12:30 p.m. Tuesday, July 22
Where: West Steps of the Colorado State Capitol
Who: Approximately 200 activists demonstrating their opposition
• Vicky Cowart, Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains – Voice for the broad-based coalition
• Karen Middleton – NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado
• Cristina Aguilar, Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights (COLOR), Bi-lingual voice calling people to action
• Dr. Ruben Alvero – Obstetrics and Gyneocology
• Nathan Woodruff-Stanley, ACLU of Colorado
• Interfaith Alliance of Colorado—Voice for damage caused by government intrusion
• Possibly Amanda Dufresne, telling personal story
Activists with Vote NO 67 Signs
• Activists with signs depicting personal reasons for opposing Amendment Personhood Amendment
• Activists streaming off the Capitol Steps
We oppose Amendment 67 because:
• It is misleading and has far-reaching consequences.
• It would make abortion a crime, and pregnant women and health care providers criminally and civilly liable for any pregnancy that does not result in a live birth, regardless of the stage of pregnancy.
• It puts the government into our personal private lives and would restrict access to common birth control options like the Pill, IUDs and emergency contraception.